Why Financial Analysts in Pharma Should Love Personalized Medicine | Diaceutics

Why Financial Analysts in Pharma Should Love Personalized Medicine

July 1st, 2016

new-why-financial-analysts-header

Financial analysts have good reason to anticipate the continued growth of personalized medicine. Not only is it affecting patients and physicians but it holds plenty of promise for the pharma industry.

General Strategic Development Benefits

Personalized medicine encourages more vertical collaboration throughout the industry. It is therefore in the best interest of pharma companies to work more closely with payers, other development companies and even patients when developing personalized medicine products. This clears the path for increased synergy, the ability to split costs with other businesses, and other various advantages that open up thanks to new technology. The key, as always, is enabling shareholders to understand these opportunities.

More Options for Mergers and Ventures

Let’s also point out a more specific advantage when it comes to strategic development—greater possibility for mergers and joint ventures. These opportunities allow financial analysts to examine a greater range of opportunities for project funding and provide a fertile bed for data on the synergies that such ventures are offering throughout the industry. In other words, industry news reports are about to get much more interesting.

Proof of Utility

Here’s an advantage that shareholders can get behind—in personalized medicine, drugs can be developed with inherent proof of utility. Thanks to wider testing and more usable mapping, it is becoming much easier to say ‘this drug can affect this condition and will be able to be used by this many patients’. There’s far less danger of carrying a drug to market only to find it less effective than envisaged.

Accurate Revenue Projections for New Drugs

Along with proof of utility, new drug development strategies that involve personalized medicine also allow for more accurate revenue projections. When treatment, efficacy and available patients are all so clearly defined, it becomes easier to control costs and estimate revenue for a particular product. Insurance companies are also fans of the predictability of personalized medicine, which can make drugs more viable on the market.

Advanced Targeting Methods

When you have a clear window revealing which patients will benefit from new products, as well as tests that help ensure the efficacy of drugs, targeting specific drugs for specific patients becomes much easier. This is, of course, a boon when it comes to marketing campaigns but it also helps create a faster, more nimble targeting method that has benefits throughout the commercialization process.

Reduced Costs for Payers

Payers also tend to be big fans of personalized medicine for the savings that it can provide them. Targeting drugs with a very high rate of efficacy means that fewer tests and ‘failed’ treatments need to be used beforehand. That equals savings per patient, which is good news to all ears.

Revenue Potential for New Systems of Treatment

There is still uncertainty when it comes to predicting how genetic profiling and sequencing will impact health care practices. It seems likely that at least a few new systems of diagnosis and treatment will be developed. That’s a whole lot of potential for analysts to study, predict, improve and apply, which means more jobs for analysts as a whole…and more revenue potential when it comes to leveraging technology.

Diaceutics CTA FP

Webinars & Podcasts

August 9th, 2018
Podcast: Oncology Patient Research
Why do we need to talk biomarkers with patients? Senior Director of Market Research at Diaceutics, Marianne Fillion, recently spearheaded an effort to gather insights directly from oncology patients to get an understanding of what they know about ...
April 20th, 2018
Podcast: PM Readiness Report 2018
Peter Keeling discusses the landscape and challenges for precision medicine, companion diagnostics, CDx or biomarker and conduit diagnostics are discussed including global laboratory test data analysis and forecasts for budget impact and value.
View all

Expert Insights

April 19th, 2018
The CMS National Coverage Decision on NGS
I. Introduction On March 16, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized a National Coverage Determination (NCD) that cove...
January 19th, 2018
What does the EU IVD Regulation mean for companion diagnostics and LDTs?
Dave Smart, PhD, Director at Diaceutics, discusses the introduction of the EU IVD Regulation. While it is considered a necessary step, the Regulati...
View all expert insights

Competitive Benchmarking Reports

March 16th, 2018
PM Readiness Report 2018 Summary
March 14th, 2017
Pharma Readiness for Diagnostic Integration 2017
View all reports

Publications

September 11th, 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma – Poster presented at European Congress of Pathology 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: a study including Austria, Germany and UK, highlighting concordance for current technologies, and potential requirement of more sensitive technologies in future applications.
August 3rd, 2018
A Way Forward: Leveraging Advanced Diagnostic Testing to Unlock the Value of Precision Medicine
Read about how advanced diagnostic testing, ensuring that right patient gets the right therapy, at the right time, particularly with respect to therapies where the test result determines whether or not the therapy should be used (precision medicin...
View all publications
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn