Integrating and Aligning the Diagnostic Strategy with the Drug Strategy (Personalized Medicine: What Pharma Should Do to Get Ready) | Diaceutics

Integrating and Aligning the Diagnostic Strategy with the Drug Strategy (Personalized Medicine: What Pharma Should Do to Get Ready)

September 6th, 2015

Tessa Sandberg

In Part 2 of the series, ‘Personalized Medicine: What Pharma Should Do to Get Ready’, Tessa Sandberg of Diaceutics discusses integrating and aligning the diagnostic strategy with the drug strategy.

Do you know Bob, the guy who holds the budget for the project? At kick-off, he made it clear that failure was not an option and that the whole company would be dependent on this project being delivered. After that, he never turned up to a single team meeting. Suddenly, it’s six months later, there is a three week slippage against the timeline and milestone three has not been met. Enough reasons for Bob to go absolutely ballistic!

I am sure you all know Bob (apologies to all the Bobs among our readers who are, most certainly, not the one I’m talking about). His behaviour is quite often encouraged in a company as it is a managerial necessity going under the name of ‘delegation’. But let’s define that term: delegation means that tasks are assigned to and executed by others because they can carry out those tasks equally well or even better than the representative issuing the instruction. To achieve this goal successfully, the representative provides supervision, guidance and support to the team whenever and wherever it is needed. Supervision and guidance can constitute a rather trivial reminder but how often does this essentially crucial aspect get forgotten? How often should “I have delegated this task” in effect be read as “I have renounced all responsibility for this deliverable”? Delegation is very different from negligence.

This is unfortunately a feature that is common not only between individual members of a team but also between companies who partner on a diagnostic (Dx) strategy. Having worked with nearly all top twenty pharma companies over the last ten years, Diaceutics has come across too many examples of “We don’t know, our Dx partner will take care of that”.

When developing a drug, the majority of pharma companies partner with Dx companies to develop a diagnostic test which will support the drug. Pharma tends to delegate the diagnostic process completely, including the aspects of supervision or guidance. The main consequence of this essentially negligent behaviour, is that the drug and the diagnostic strategies are not properly aligned which results in the test not supporting the drug and, in a worst case scenario, has a negative impact on the drug.

Based on our expertise in the field we have identified the three best practices that pharma should consider to avoid such a scenario:

  1. Review the positioning of the diagnostic in the drug development process
    Assume that the asset will need a diagnostic test. Pharma and diagnostic companies come together to review and define how they want to position the diagnostic test to best support the drug.
  2. Develop a diagnostic strategy
    Once the question ‘How do we want to position the diagnostic test?’ has been answered, pharma and diagnostic companies will develop a Dx strategy with feasible milestones. To achieve this goal, a Dx strategy has to be developed early enough in the drug development process ([php snippet=34 param=”title=as discussed in article 1 of this series&id=968″]).
  3. Fully integrate the Dx strategy with the drug strategy
    While developing the Dx strategy, we highly recommend fully aligning the Dx and the drug strategy so the test and the drug can be launched simultaneously (Figure 1). Lack of coordination between drug and Dx test development can lead to the drug being launched without the diagnostic on the label. To facilitate this, pharma companies can integrate the Dx strategy into the Target Test Profile, a key strategic planning document.

Now, just think for one more moment about a new and improved Bob, and imagine him properly delegating tasks and supervising, supporting and giving guidance to his team. He knows what’s happening, he’s keeping a watchful eye but he trusts his team to do their job. Thinking of Bob using his best managerial talents will help us to see how pharma can only fully integrate the Dx strategy to the drug if they delegate the Dx development and commercialization to their Dx company, checking in from time to time rather than giving them total responsibility. Ensuring a good and strong partnership deal is essential and something that will be discussed in the next article.

 

aligning

Figure 1. The diagnostic and drug strategies are aligned to each other to ensure simultaneous launch which will contribute to drug adoption.

Blogs

View all blogs

Webinars & Podcasts

August 9th, 2018
Podcast: Oncology Patient Research
Why do we need to talk biomarkers with patients? Senior Director of Market Research at Diaceutics, Marianne Fillion, recently spearheaded an effort to gather insights directly from oncology patients to get an understanding of what they know about ...
April 20th, 2018
Podcast: PM Readiness Report 2018
Peter Keeling discusses the landscape and challenges for precision medicine, companion diagnostics, CDx or biomarker and conduit diagnostics are discussed including global laboratory test data analysis and forecasts for budget impact and value.
View all

Expert Insights

April 19th, 2018
The CMS National Coverage Decision on NGS
I. Introduction On March 16, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized a National Coverage Determination (NCD) that cove...
January 19th, 2018
What does the EU IVD Regulation mean for companion diagnostics and LDTs?
Dave Smart, PhD, Director at Diaceutics, discusses the introduction of the EU IVD Regulation. While it is considered a necessary step, the Regulati...
View all expert insights

Competitive Benchmarking Reports

March 16th, 2018
PM Readiness Report 2018 Summary
March 14th, 2017
Pharma Readiness for Diagnostic Integration 2017
View all reports

Case Studies

View all case studies

Publications

May 23rd, 2019
Diaceutics reviews the ongoing debate on diagnostics reform legislation
Thought leaders at Diaceutics recently authored a peer-reviewed article that covers the ongoing national debate over diagnostics reform legislation in the United States. The article is now available online ahead of print in the Journal of Molecula...
September 11th, 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma – Poster presented at European Congress of Pathology 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: a study including Austria, Germany and UK, highlighting concordance for current technologies, and potential requirement of more sensitive technologies in future applications.
View all publications
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn