Pharma CEOs Get Ready! Arrival of Personalized Medicine Litigation is as Much About Culture as Science | Diaceutics

Pharma CEOs Get Ready! Arrival of Personalized Medicine Litigation is as Much About Culture as Science

April 3rd, 2014

Peter Keeling

Peter Keeling, CEO of Diaceutics, comments on the Plavix lawsuits and the impact on personalized medicine.

As recently reported in the US financial press [i] [2014], the first real personalized medicine influenced litigation has arrived. Specifically, attorneys general in five US states—California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi and West Virginia—have sued Plavix co-developers Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Sanofi, accusing the companies of lying to authorities about the blockbuster blood thinner’s ability to treat specific subpopulations. Both companies vigorously defend their positions.

As we published in the Personalized Medicine Journal as far back as 2007,[ii]such litigation was only a matter of when, not if. It remains our view that several layers of potential risk lie hidden in ‘subpopulation therapy design’.

Such litigation will be complex, with science versus science alongside ‘who knew what and when’ arguments which no doubt will rage on in the courts for years to come. Since personalized medicine development is characterized every day by matrixed decisions to co-develop a test strategy or not, based on early clinical trial read outs and, as our data indicates, there are approximately 400- plus biomarker targeted therapy assets currently working their way through Phase 2 and 3 trials, such litigation has the potential to spread quickly.

At its core, this litigation poses a central and fundamental cultural issue for Pharma C suites, namely does the well-publicized commercial uncertainty about personalized medicine and untrained decision-making to market a therapy without a test, create long-term legal exposure for pharma?

Our view postulated some seven years back remains unchanged: “It is very likely that the pharmaceutical industry treating physicians will eventually face legal liability arising from the use of PGx in drug development…this liability will arise in the form of standard product liability litigation, medical malpractice and novel defect theories. If sufficient time passes, liability might even arise from failing to utilize PGx strategies in drug development as the state of art shifts.”

We have gone on record to say that the personalized medicine tipping point will need sticks and carrots. Specifically, we have postulated that alongside the carrot, well-designed personalized medicine commercial strategies can deliver equivalent or greater ROI to pharma shareholders will likely be the stick of litigation. The carrot has been evident in niche blockbuster oncology therapies for a few years now. The stick just appeared!

 

 

Blogs

View all blogs

Webinars & Podcasts

August 9th, 2018
Podcast: Oncology Patient Research
Why do we need to talk biomarkers with patients? Senior Director of Market Research at Diaceutics, Marianne Fillion, recently spearheaded an effort to gather insights directly from oncology patients to get an understanding of what they know about ...
April 20th, 2018
Podcast: PM Readiness Report 2018
Peter Keeling discusses the landscape and challenges for precision medicine, companion diagnostics, CDx or biomarker and conduit diagnostics are discussed including global laboratory test data analysis and forecasts for budget impact and value.
View all

Expert Insights

April 19th, 2018
The CMS National Coverage Decision on NGS
I. Introduction On March 16, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized a National Coverage Determination (NCD) that cove...
January 19th, 2018
What does the EU IVD Regulation mean for companion diagnostics and LDTs?
Dave Smart, PhD, Director at Diaceutics, discusses the introduction of the EU IVD Regulation. While it is considered a necessary step, the Regulati...
View all expert insights

Competitive Benchmarking Reports

March 16th, 2018
PM Readiness Report 2018 Summary
March 14th, 2017
Pharma Readiness for Diagnostic Integration 2017
View all reports

Case Studies

View all case studies

Publications

September 11th, 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma – Poster presented at European Congress of Pathology 2018
BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: a study including Austria, Germany and UK, highlighting concordance for current technologies, and potential requirement of more sensitive technologies in future applications.
August 3rd, 2018
A Way Forward: Leveraging Advanced Diagnostic Testing to Unlock the Value of Precision Medicine
Read about how advanced diagnostic testing, ensuring that right patient gets the right therapy, at the right time, particularly with respect to therapies where the test result determines whether or not the therapy should be used (precision medicin...
View all publications
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn