Economics of Genomic Testing for Women with Breast Cancer - Diaceutics
+

Economics of Genomic Testing for Women with Breast Cancer

February 22nd, 2014

Jordan Clark

Jordan Clark of Diaceutics comments on the American Journal of Managed Care article ‘Economics of Genomic Testing for Women With Breast Cancer’ and highlights that personalized medicine is being held back by the unwillingness of payers to reimburse genomic testing.

Robert D Lieberthal, PhD, from the Jefferson Population Health Continuing Professional Education Collaborative, describes in the American Journal of Managed Care (http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2013/2013-1-vol19-n12/economics-of-genomic-testing-for-women-with-breast-cancer/4) what he believes to be the first structured review of the economics of breast cancer care.  The NIH estimates that the annual financial burden of breast cancer is around $14 billion. Lieberthal’s excellent review highlights what is generally agreed, namely that genomic testing and personalized medicine can reduce costs but that there is still inadequate reimbursement for genomic studies.

We wholeheartedly agree with the recommendation from Dr Lieberthal that more studies into the health economics of personalized medicine are urgently needed. In addition, the move towards inclusion of direct clinical trial data as the backbone of such studies would be an improvement on the current modeling algorithm approach. He eloquently visualizes the direct and indirect cost of breast cancer care and it is a stark reminder that genomic testing is only a small, but essential, gear in the patient care pathway.

Elsewhere in the Expert Insight titled [php snippet=34 param=”title=PM2.0&id=77&useTitle=true”] we discuss that in order for personalized medicine to fulfil its potential, we must start taking the long-term holistic view of health economics, rather than a short-term detrimental view, that will not fund genomic testing in the order of $100s. The cost of genomic testing pales into insignificance when compared to the potential direct and indirect cost savings of treating cancer using precision medicine.

Of course, we recognize that the fragmentation of stakeholders and inefficiencies of reimbursement systems currently supporting personalized medicine, and companion diagnostics in particular, are holding back a shift to PM2.0. However, it all starts with the data and this paper should ring alarm bells for us all given that even in breast cancer, where we now have some of the most advanced biomarker and risk assessment tools, we do not have the business model sorted out. Pity.

Blogs

View all blogs

Webinars & Podcasts

August 20th, 2019
Podcast: How Diaceutics is repairing the diagnostic testing ecoystem for patients worldwide
Diaceutics CEO, Peter Keeling joins Pat Kenny on Newstalk FM to discuss how analyzing Big Data to implement better diagnostic testing can help patients access better treatment options for cancer and other life-threatening diseases.
July 5th, 2019
Liquid Biopsy in NSCLC
View all

Expert Insights

April 19th, 2018
The CMS National Coverage Decision on NGS
I. Introduction On March 16, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized a National Coverage Determination (NCD) that cove...
January 19th, 2018
What does the EU IVD Regulation mean for companion diagnostics and LDTs?
Dave Smart, PhD, Director at Diaceutics, discusses the introduction of the EU IVD Regulation. While it is considered a necessary step, the Regulati...
View all expert insights

Competitive Benchmarking Reports

October 21st, 2019
Pharma Precision Medicine Readiness Report 2019
March 16th, 2018
PM Readiness Report 2018 Summary
View all reports

Case Studies

View all case studies

Publications

June 25th, 2019
FLT3 testing in relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia setting is becoming increasingly common, but laboratory turnaround times (TAT) may be a barrier to treatment with second generation FLT3 inhibitors
The treatment landscape in AML has developed at an astonishing pace in the last 3 years, with 5 therapies being approved by the FDA. FLT3 inhibitors gilteritinib (Gil) and quizartinib (Quiz) present an unprecedented opportunity for improved surviv...
May 23rd, 2019
Diaceutics reviews the ongoing debate on diagnostics reform legislation
Thought leaders at Diaceutics recently authored a peer-reviewed article that covers the ongoing national debate over diagnostics reform legislation in the United States. The article is now available online ahead of print in the Journal of Molecula...
View all publications